Immigration has positively changed the economy and society of several top international destinations, such as Canada, the UK, the US, Australia, to name a few. This is another matter that immigration has not got its due in most situations and places, and in some cases, even attacked by those who have their own axe to grind.
Echoing a somewhat similar feeling, a well-known observer on Australia immigration and its impacts on the Australian society and its economy, reportedly, says that it is essential to be on guard against what he terms is the nativist inclination. He says that the national economy’s 26-year growth and development would not have been possible had a big flood of precious human resources not enriched the country.
Oz just successfully concluded its 26th successive year of excellent economic development and expansion. Though it’s all the time happy to broadcast that, but one main cause doesn’t get sufficient respect. And that’s not the admirable climb of China–the nation’s most important trading partner, which surely played its part to perfection. It is neither the nation’s mineral capital nor the fiscal stimulus released in 2008-2009, to battle the international recession.

The silent force at the back of this excellent and motivating expansion and development is immigration, states the observer. The decision-makers ought to be full-throated involving the part immigration has had in supporting the nation’s near-historic run. There is a very good tale to narrate, and the world should listen as all are interested in economic growth and progress.
Australia has its own right-wing nativist crowd. The urban-rural divide familiar to the Northern Hemisphere readers is changing the outlines of discussion in the Kangaroo Land — although less bluntly, in part because obligatory voting continues the influence of dense populace hubs & mainstream political outfits. There’s a danger that immigration draws attack and the two key political groups–trying to prevent a loss of support–go cold on population renewal also.
The mockery is that just as Australia cools to its points-based immigration structure, that method is getting buzz outside the nation. Would-be migrants are given a position on the basis of the country’s requirement for their expertise. It is also mandatory that successfully sail through the compulsory health & character tests. There’s an English-language test on the nation’s constitution, history and values.
As per another expert, population growth, a great deal of the same via immigration, has improved the national population by 50% through the course of the preceding 30 years.
He, reportedly, adds that “strong” populace rise flattered the Australian headline growth numbers. Allegedly, the GDP growth per capita surely looks less overwhelming; it was close-to zero at the close of the year gone by.
Hence, where the problem lies?
For the sake of clarity, let’s divide it into two parts. The first is the genuine fear about the pressure exerted on the surroundings. Australia is very large but huge tracts are hardly occupied. Majority of individuals stay in selected pockets in the Eastern and Southern shores mainly. Hence, that sliver of the country is progressively strained in terms of infrastructure. Cost of accommodation is beyond reach for several, though that’s not an exclusively Australian occurrence.
The second part is prickly: some petty minded people and politicians demonize immigration believing it will aid them win crucial support of the voters in the outer suburbs or the rural regions of the country. Obligatory voting guarantees that since everybody have to turn up, the most extreme aspirants are inclined to be counterbalanced or suppressed by the comparatively more traditional parties. They may still draw off votes, emerge victorious on some seats, rattle around and create distress.
It’s the latter point that is the danger today, both powered and compounded by the truth that the incumbent Australian Premier Malcolm Turnbull’s conservative alliance has a mere one-seat majority in the Australian parliament’s lower house. Though the opposition Labor Party smells a chance, its leadership is worried with tactics instead of plan.
Immigration is an easy, but dangerous, subject on which to make capitalize. Minus it, the nation’s amazing and inspiring economic tale would not have been something to go to town with. For the sake of lengthening that wonderful 26-year run, politicians would do well to repel the nativist pull, concludes the observer.